The HebeBC anyone?

Today I have a quiz for you. Take a look at the guy on the left and try to work out whether he's more likely to be a descendant of  (a) legendary BBC founder Lord Reith, or (b) a pickpocket from the Baghdad Bazaar. Well done if you chose the latter. For Alan Yentob's parents were Jews who fled Baghdad - possibly with a furious horde of recently-bilked Muslims in hot pursuit - choosing England as their new host. Fast-forward a few decades and he's been magicked into what the London Independent describes as 'the guy who decides what you'll see on the BBC'.  You may well ask what accounts for his achieving this unique position at the apogee of British society.

We can all agree he didn't get it on his looks.('Would you buy a used car from this man?'). Nor on his journalistic integrity. You see he was caught faking interviews, possibly the gravest offence open to a TV producer. But far from ending his career, as it would had he been for example Lord Reith's grandson, he amazed everyone and actually got promoted instead. Really. This remarkable escape seems to have inculcated - with justification - a sense of invincibility as he subsequently awarded himself, on top of his salary as full-time BBC Creative Director, an additional £183,000 a year for presenting the Imagine programme. He also - somehow - has managed to acquire a pension pot worth £6 million. Not bad for a humble public servant, is it? And by the way it's apparently anti-Semitic, potentially leading to another Holocau$t(™)  to question any of this.

Maybe Danny Cohen can explain Yentob's otherwise inexplicable rise. Because Danny's own rise has been even more spectacular....to the very top position, Director Of Television. And at the tender and unprecedented age of 38. Everyone was astounded at this extraordinary appointment. Well almost everyone. What explains this meteoric rise? Well, earlier he had enhanced the Beeb's legendary international status with such artistic gems as Snog, Marry, Avoid (Objective: Improve 'slap addicts' by stripping them of their makeup and skimpy clothes), Hotter Than My Daughter (which I'll leave to your imagination) and best of all, Skins. This artistic tour de force followed the lives of Sixth Form (12th Grade) students and celebrated with them and their dysfunctional families as they drank, fornicated and vomited their way through the show. He also aired a tribute to the notorious paedophile Jimmy Saville even after his child-molesting became public knowledge.

All in the finest traditions of Lord Reith.

Danny also ordained - in response to an accusation of partiality - the BBC to be  'not neutral when it comes to multiculturalism and diversity'.  We'd never have guessed that, Danny. Strangely enough he doesn't do diversity and multiculturalism in his own life at all, going to Jewish schools and marrying a balabatish.  Maybe this is explained by the legendary Jewish trait of selfless altruism whereby he forgoes the benefits of diversity so that we goys can have even more of it. Or it could have something to do with the fact that Cohens are severely restricted in whom they can marry.

In fact Yentob and Cohen are by now the norm, not the exception as Jews predominate at the commanding heights of the "British" Broadcasting Corporation. We have or had at Controller level Janice Hadlow, Zai Bennett,  Richard Klein and Mark  ('I should have done more to make the BBC less white') Damazer;  executive board Member Marcus Paul (married to the daughter of Edmund de Rothschild), Tony Cohen, Alan Bookbinder (Head of Religion and Ethics, no less) Jenny Abramsky and former Director General the crypto Greg Dyke who on his appointment in 2001 described the Beeb as 'hideously White'. Check out Anthony Rueben as well, chosen without competition for the specially-created and very powerful post of Head Of Statistics. To ensure balanced reporting statistics. ROTFL!.

(Reader nilus has profiled correspondents and presenters in the last comment on this thread).

Maybe they should rename it the HebeBC.

So now this venerable British institution has been transformed into a Jewish-controlled propaganda outlet, a cesspool of  anti-White, anti-British, anti-Christian, anti-family and anti-male subversion. And all paid for by the subversion target - the British taxpayer. Bad enough in itself but, due in part to incompetent vibrants being shoehorned into every possible role, the standard of programming has also plummeted with endless re-runs of evil Nazi (shudder) 'documentaries' and copies of bottom-of-the-barrel American style dross. No surprise then that its viewers and listeners continue to desert it in droves.

Mark another one down in the Long March Through The Institutions.

Lord Reith must be turning in his grave.

Sudden Onset Dementia (SOD). A new syndrome discovered

Writing in this month's Lancet Prof. Myron Goldstein of Oxford University Medical School revealed the identification of a hitherto unclassified syndrome entitled Sudden Onset Dementia (SOD). As with Familial Hyperinsulinism and Nemaline Myopathy SOD uniquely impacts Ashkenazi Jews. Prof. Goldtein attributes this to millennia of unique Jewish sufferink. Unlike conventional dementia, SOD can strike at an extraordinarily early age, even as young as 55 in the case of Ernest ('Deadly Ernest') Saunders.

Signs and Symptoms: The onset is quite dramatic and appears to be precipitated by serious criminal accusations against the victim. This is followed by intense meetings with legal and PR advisers and the victim transferring assets to his family and Jewish charities.

Diagnosis: Empirical evidence suggests only Jewish medical staff are capable of successfully diagnosing the condition. Prof. Goldstein attributes this facility to a collective unconscious meme, evolved over millennia of unique Jewish persecution, which provides an empathy inaccessible to goyim.

Treatment:  Highly satisfactory outcomes can be achieved through prompt and methodical treatment. This includes hefty donations to powerful political figures, the 'vanishing' of incriminating evidence from prosecution files, blackmail and plaintive cries of anti-Semitism.

Prognosis: With correct treatment the prognosis is excellent. The most celebrated recovery was undoubtedly that of Ernest Saunders who was literally back in business weeks after being freed from serious criminal charges. More recently accused paedophile Greville Jenner gave a complex speech to the Israeli Knesset despite being diagnosed with SOD a little more than a year earlier.

A lesson in practical morality

As a keen student of philosophy Pope Francis will be aware of the Socratic precept which defines impractical morality as no morality. And a very fine precept it is too, one that should be emblazoned over the front door of every SJW's* trendy house in the leafy suburbs. The current brouhaha over migrant drownings in the Med brings this to mind. "Fury At Europe As Hundreds Perish" thundered the Guardian, while the Irish Slimes, never one to miss out on an opportunity for self-flagellation, declares the drownings "A Challenge To Fortress Europe".

Don't you just love that?  Fortress Europe.  Good God, if Europe's a fortress I'd hate to see what an open border would look like.  Oh wait, I can!  The Southern border of the USA.

Anyway, back to Pope Francis.  He's been getting into the act big time, arriving at the remarkable conclusion that migrants are 'fellow human beings'.  And that we should 'open our hearts' (and by inference our borders and wallets) to accommodate these 'unfortunate victims'.  Fine Your Holiness. So here's a suggestion.  I know Vatican City (a sovereign State) is small, but there's plenty of room to accommodate a hundred or so of those victims you worry so much about.  A few prefabs in the corner of St. Peter's Square would do nicely. And every morning you could look out and savour the vibrant diversity that you're so keen to foist on the rest of us.

What's that you say? Your guests' friends and relatives might decide to move in as well? And  that your new neighbours might include the noble Islamic seafarers who recently consigned their Christian fellow passengers to a watery grave?  In response I'd say welcome to the real world. Nothing like bringing a manifestation of a problem to one's own doorstep to concentrate one's mind on practical solutions. Yes, practical solutions.  As distinct from preening, bleating, sanctimonious nostrums, geared towards flaunting one's superior morality while doing nothing to resolve the underlying problem.

And very often actually exacerbating the underlying problem. Because it's as sure as night following day that should Europe offer free access to anyone who wants it the Med would be black (whoops) with boats, packed to the gunwales, heading for a life of  plenty courtesy of the European taxpayer. Inevitably the casualties would show a commensurate increase, even with beefed-up rescue resources.  The so-called solution would only make things worse.

But, on the by no means certain assumption that the SJWs actually do want a practical solution, there is one readily at hand.  Guaranteed to work, cheap, and easily implemented.  Deaths at sea eliminated at a stroke. An SJW's dream.  The  exquisitely simple Australian Solution involves intercepting all trafficking vessels and towing them back to their embarkation point (almost invariably Indonesia). In that post I quote an Afghan people smuggler who openly conceded the deterrent effect on smugglers and their clients. Asked if he believed the Abbott government's policy of turning back the boats would work he replied: "Of course it will work, it is working." 

And there should be zero surprise at this.  If  asylum seekers know, and know for certain, that they will be turned back, they will not come.  Even a sociology professor should be able to see this. 

Practical morality of the kind Socrates had in mind.

Pope and other SJWs please note.

* Social Justice Warriors

Blog developments

All readers, well almost all readers, will be delighted to know that page views for this blog have grown at a dramatic rate over the last year. The tracking graph has been at about 45 degrees for a long time and views now at over 7,000 a day. Given that few readers will visit every day I think we can assume that our overall readership figure must be in the 15,00 to 20,000 range. For a blog of this nature that is a seriously good readership and if this growth continues who knows where we might end up?

I don't know what accounts for this dramatic increase but I do know it will continue if readers continually link to posts on other forums especially the large MSM outlets. So please continue to do that.

This success has unfortunately attracted a huge volume of trolls, hasbaras and spammers. Easily averaging over 1,000 per day. This of course plays havoc with my comment moderation.  Inevitably some valid comments will be deleted accidentally so if that happens to one of yours accept my apologies in advance and please continue to comment.

Onwards and upwards!

I need your help again

Just like with the previous post I'm confused and in need of your help. Allow me to explain.

My confusion relates to the widely acclaimed, indeed legendary,  Death Camp testimony by Elie Wiesel called Night. And few writers have been the recipients of so much admiration - and money - as Elie. 'Fearless', 'searing truth', 'unsparing'...how could any self-respecting student of the Holocau$t™ (the Word's Greatest Tragedy) not read this canonical testament? But you see I kept putting it off. Not being a ghoul, how could I bear to read about:

Screaming babies hurled into gas chambers by Dr. Mengele himself

Fountains of blood exploding from the heaving mass of  decomposing bodies buried in mass graves

Prisoners forced to take acid baths 

Pumping prisoners full of water until they exploded. Christ, how lousy is that?

Injections directly into the brown eyes of untermencher to change them to a Teutonic blue

Camp Kommandant Laak tossing babies in the air and shooting them like clay pigeons while his cackling ten year-old daughter wildly applauds.  As only a Germans kid would.

And lots more.  So you can imagine my reluctant to subject myself to such horrors. I wouldn't sleep for a week. But a guy's gotta do what a guy's gotta do.

So with trembling hands I took up 'Night'. And it was every bit as harrowing as I had feared. Mind you there were some puzzling aspects. For instance we learn that Elie was treated in the Auschwitz camp hospital (where incidentally he tells us the quality of food was good) after which the doctor recommended 'a few days rest to recuperate'. And thus my first question. Was not Auschwitz a Death Camp, where mass extermination was the only game in town?  And in case you're wondering, Elie was not some valuable specialist, merely a humble sorting clerk.

Then right at the end of the war we had more strange hospital goings-on.  The Auschwitz medicos were treating Elie's dad in the Death Camp's hospital (even at a time of horrendous German casualties) when word came down that the camp was to be evacuated.  Prisoners were given the choice: Undertake an arduous journey to a new Death Camp......or relax and wait for liberation at the hands of the Red Army  Seems like the ultimate no-brainer. But wait for this...Elie dragged his infirm father out of the hospital and the two of them headed off with the fiendish Germans!

Mind you the Germans were under strict instructions to bludgeon any stragglers to death. I'm sure there's an explanation but, like, if they had given prisoners the option of remaining in Auschwitz why would they then want to kill stragglers?  Anyway, you'll be glad to know that when they arrived at the new Death Camp they were all treated to a hot shower and a 'cauldron of thick soup'. In due course this camp was also liberated, and "early the next day Jewish boys ran off to Wiemar to steal clothing and potatoes. And to rape German shiksas."  Ah well, boys will be boys.  Meanwhile Elie went on to fame and - most definitely - fortune. It could be said he actually created a whole new industry which thrives to this day.

So this is where I need your help. How do we reconcile all of those horrendous Death Camp incidents mentioned at the beginning with Elie's account of the incidents I referred to?  It's not easily explained. I have to confess to an ignoble thought crossing my mind...was he lying? But then I reminded myself that he was, just like Henry Kissinger, Menachim Begin and indeed Barak Obama,  a Nobel Peace Prize laureate.  And could you imagine any of these guys lying?  So I quickly - and shamefully - dismissed that thought.

But that only brings me back to square one. I'm at a loss to explain this conundrum.

Are there any wise readers out there who can clear my mind?

Can you help with this paradox?

I need your help here with a seemingly intractable problem. You see I'm reading a lot about the evils of White Flight which it seems is a Very Bad Thing, having a dreadful impact on the vibrants left behind. Whites apparently 'take all the jobs with them' while property prices and local tax revenues collapse with their departure. Meanwhile the unfortunate vibrants left behind "suffer from" all kinds of pathologies like collapsing infrastructure, murder, assault, robbery and drug addiction.  Strangely enough the identity of those making the Left Behind suffer is never made clear. I wonder could it be the suburban Whites sneaking back in at night? Who knows?

So that's one thing. Now the other concerns gentrification. This refers to the practise whereby Whites, presumably touched by the suffering of the homeboys, leave their comfy suburbs and return to the city. You'd imagine, given the calamities of White Flight,  its reversal would be greeted with joyous outpourings from the Left Behind. But no.  It seems that gentrification is also a Very Bad Thing. Why?  Apparently it leads to the "forced disenfranchisement and displacement of poor and working class people from the spaces and places in which they have legitimate social and historical claims and brings new standards in consumption, particularly in the form of excess and superfluity."    And latte at $5 a cup.

Oh dear. So we have black 'community leaders' bemoaning the flight of White residents from their cities. And then bemoaning their return as well.  I have to concede I'm puzzled by this (scratchin' ma haid).

Can any of this blog's wise readers help me?

Optimising face-time

The Irish Immigration Control Platform (ICP) has been getting some good airtime recently, including an appearance before a Parliamentary Committee and on a popular TV program (the Vincent Browne Show). Browne being Ireland's Jeremy Paxman equivalent. On that show their spokeswoman Aine Ni Chonaill (Ann O'Connell) came across as intelligent and with a masterful command of the facts. The problem though is that while a masterful command of the facts works great in a book or academic paper it does not really cut it on TV or indeed on any forum where participants are constrained by time and subject to interruptions. Therefore In the spirit of constructive criticism and as guidance for any reader with the same opportunity I offer the following free of charge.

First, in a short TV interview with only minutes of talk-time do not get bogged down in detailed facts. On such a forum nobody is interested in 'according to United Nations Statute 46.2.14 as amended by Statute 56.3.66  on 25/10/201 and subsequently incorporated into the ECHR requirements etc.etc.......'. That's ok for a book or an academic article, not for a short sound bite.  Just say 'international law requires..'

Keep the message simple and embodied in a small number of key concepts. It should be possible to deploy one or more of them to almost any question asked. Here are a few:

• In Ireland all asylum seekers are bogus, i.e. asylum tourists. This derives from the simple fact that genuine asylum seekers are obliged by 'international law' to lodge their application in the country they first "escape" to.  Ireland has no direct linkages to any of the hell holes concerned, ipso facto we cannot be the 'first country' for anyone.

• Every foreign adult in Ireland is either taking the job of an Irish person or alternatively drawing unemployment benefit. (In reality of course lots of them are doing both!)

• The state spends hundreds of millions annually is support of the immigration industry.  Cite this in the context  of the multiple problems faced by Irish citizens due to Government austerity. 'Little Johnny can't get that heart operation due to lack of resources.  I'd sooner spend the money on him rather than on asylum tourists'. Keep plugging the lack of school places, long hospital waiting lists etc.

• The so-called regularising of illegals is Orwellian NewSpeak. Regularising would mean sending the asylum tourists/illegal immigrants back while prioritising those following the legal route.

• The impact of Third World immigration on Western countries has been disastrous. Be able to recite a range of chilling examples. 'Why are we not learning from the mistakes of others?'.

• Cite Aristotle to the effect that impractical morality is no morality. So when some craw-thumper like the Pope appeals for all immigrants to be welcomed to our shores ask how such vast numbers can be housed, schooled, their health looked after etc.

• Cite international examples, most notably that of America, to show that amnesties, far from drawing a line under the problem, result in massive additional waves of immigrants.

• When challenged about the drownings in the Med cite the Australian example which shows that the certain knowledge of being towed back to where they embarked will stop the trafficking instantly.  End of tragedies on the high seas. Real practical morality would therefore call for this solution.

• When your humanity is challenged you must exude empathy baby! Aine was asked something like 'don't you think migrant woman and children drowning in the Med should be rescued?' Her response was along the lines of  'ICP don't have a position on that'. NOT GOOD!  While technically correct it makes dreadful television. Or radio. Or any forum really.  Say 'my heart goes out to those unfortunate people. However if we operated a rigorous repatriation policy they wouldn't undertake the journey in the first place'.  

As I said, one or more of these snappy factlets can be woven in to any answer to almost any question. They can and should be adapted for other countries.  The outcome will be positive, minds changed.

Try it.

Our futures depend on it.

The elephant gets ignored again

Have you been following the Rolling Stone "A Rape On Campus"  story?  I have and from early days suspected it to be another media-induced frenzy, another sortie against the White Male Enemy. Just like all those hoax nooses and swastika daubings. And of course not forgetting po' little Trayvon and all the gentle giants -future neurosurgeons one and all -  mercilessly gunned down by racist White cops.

And what a terrible story Rolling Stone told us.  When yet another hand clamped over her mouth, Jackie bit it, and the hand became a fist that punched her in the face. "Grab its motherfucking leg," she heard a voice say. And that's when Jackie knew she was going to be raped. She remembers every moment of the next three hours of agony, during which, she says, seven men took turns raping her, while two more – her date, Drew, and another man – gave instruction and encouragement. As the last man sank onto her, Jackie was startled to recognize him: He attended her tiny anthropology discussion group. He looked like he was going to cry or puke as he told the crowd he couldn't get it up. "Pussy!" the other men jeered. "What, she's not hot enough for you?" Then they egged him on: "Don't you want to be a brother?" "We all had to do it, so you do, too."

And the evidence in support of Jackie's story? Er, none actually.  Yes, Rolling Stone actually published a major story, slandering a whole university and in particular the Phi Kappa Psi fraternity without a shred of supporting evidence. Eventually the story unravelled (and Steve Sailer deserves a hat tip here) leading to a damning report by the Columbia School of Journalism. The report goes into excoriating detail on the 'failures' at multiple levels which lead to the story appearing. But of course the elephant in the room is studiously avoided. By this report and all the others.

Because this particular elephant is pure blood Jewish. The owner and published of RS, its Managing Editor, the "journalist" who concocted the story and the internal legal counsel who gave it the go-ahead  -  in fact all the decision-makers in the process - are Jewish. As is the co-author of the RS retraction article cited above.  Yet this crucial fact gets the Nelson's Eye treatment in just about every report.

Now let me tell you how this debacle unfolded, seeing as you won't come across it anywhere else. The decision-makers saw the opportunity to stick the knife into a venerable symbol of the Old South (a university founded by Tom Jefferson himself no less) and the all-white frat boys. The "journalist" herself gives the game away by describing UV's  'aura of preppy success, where throngs of toned,tanned and overwhelmingly blond students fanned across a landscape of neoclassical brick buildings.'

Boy, can you just imagine the eagerness with which that group of nation-wreckers at the RS took up Jackie's story? All sense and discretion went out the window at the thought of inflicting a mortal blow to the hated goyim. The frog and the scorpion fable redux.

And by the way, despite being described by the Colombia School Of Journalism as the  worst piece of journalism in 2014 none of the culprits got fired. Oy vey, have they not suffered enough?

PS: Good post on this subject over at the Occidental Observer.

Eschatology

When Lady Savant and I were very young, early to mid-twenties, we were best friends with a right couple of hell-raisers. Think of Keith Richards and Miley Cyrus and you'll get the idea.  But then they Got Religion. Became Jehovah's Witnesses. And changed utterly. Not least by getting a sense of humour transplant while streams of four-letter words were replaced by 'oh dear'.  Worst of all they tried to convert Lady Savant and me onto the Path of Righteousness. A hopeless task, as you can well imagine.

Allowing for that the attempted conversion process itself proved to be highly entertaining, not least their doctrines on eschatology, the study of End Times. They were on a sticky wicket on this given that their interpretation of the Bible said the world would end in 1914.  Watching them squirm on that hook provided us with endless fun. They were on firmer ground, impressive ground really, in showing that the return of the Jews to Israel was also prophesied  The ultimate nonsense though was the prophesy of World Government which they saw as embodied in the United Nations. You know, the same UN that has down the years proven itself incapable of  taking over and controlling as much as a small village.

This World Government was the manifestation of Lucifer's power on earth. They were at pains to emphasise that Lucifer was a different being from Satan. The latter was your traditional Bad Guy, cloven hoofs, evil red eyes, cackling maniacally as he tortured the wicked in Hell. Lucifer (the Anti-Christ) was/is different. A Fallen Angel, his crime was more insidious and therefore worse. The sin of Pride.  He believed that mortals could become immortal, all-knowing, Enlightened...... in effect God themselves. Naturally this pissed Jehovah off big-time and Lucifer was banished to Earth where to this day he continues to fight back.

Anyway once the Luciferian World Government is establish
ed Jehovah is going to come down to Earth and in the Battle of Armageddon (there is such a place, you know, in northern Israel) he's going to kick Lucifer's ass for the last time and eliminate all the world's evil people.

Oh, how we laughed. But as the man said, we're not laughing now. Followers of Lucifer claim that he is not evil, merely being the symbol of Enlightenment, a seeker after human perfection and the ultimate occult  knowledge. Something like Prometheus in Greek mythology. Now consider that in the context of genetic engineering especially as applied to the brain, most notably on the pre-frontal lobe where our moral compass resides. We can now genetically alter even our memories making us virtually different people. And we're also close to the stage where 'defective' genes can be replaced, potentially making the recipients immortal, at least in theory.

Just as Lucifer promised.

And what about World Government?  Well, who can deny that a master globalisation project is underway? Really powerful transnational organisations such as the EU, and ostensible 'trade' bodies such as NAFTA and the WTO (the TPP will take things to a new level) acquire more and more power as do various international courts.  Powerful politicians such as GHW Bush, Tony Blair, Mikhail Gorbachev and Gordon Brown have openly spoken of plans for a New World Order, while David Rockefeller has admitted planning for what is in effect World Government. And with current rates of mass Third World immigration to White countries and the ensuing miscegenation we see the road ahead as one in which a population of deracinated dumbed-down serfs is lorded over by a self-selecting elite of.......  Luciferians? Who by the way already seem to be living for ever. Will those evil NWO reptilian fucks like Rockefelller, Soros, Kissinger and Greenspan ever die?

Have I bought into the whole Jehovah's Witnesses eschatology? No. But you really have to wonder, don't you? In this post I wrote in relation to White racial suicide  "the achievement, if I can call it that, of inducing the most successful race in the world, the creator of the most advanced civilisation ever seen, to turn on itself and willingly self-destruct by way of societal degradation and internecine warfare is simply awesome. So incredible that, even as an agnostic, I sometimes wonder whether some supernatural agency is not after all involved."

Is there?