Monday, 16 October 2017

Unanswered questions on foreign aid

Take up the White Man's burden,The savage wars of peace--
Fill full the mouth of Famine And bid the sickness cease;
And when your goal is nearest The end for others sought,
Watch sloth and heathen Folly Bring all your hopes to nought.

The over-riding and all-consuming priority for every politician in a parliamentary democracy is to hold onto his seat. (I derive intense satisfaction from not saying ‘his or her’ seat). Irish politicians, due to the multi-seat proportional representation system, are more sensitive than most, as there's only a handful of really safe seats in the whole country. To keep his seat the pol must keep his constituents happy. This involves diverting as much government largess as possible to his constituency, and above all in avoiding closure of police stations, hospitals, schools quangos or any other publicly funded institution.

Naturally, the pols do everything in their power to prevent such cash-saving actions. They cajole every Minister, threaten to leave the party, to vote against it, to join the opposition or whatever. The pressure on those around the Cabinet table is immense. Small wonder that the battles are so fierce and prolonged despite the figures involved often being quite small, say €10 million annually. They scour every item of expenditure to save a million here, a million there. Always with an eye to the political impact (i.e. their careers). Awful, painful, career-ending cost-based decisions must be made.

As they tear at each other around the Cabinet table why doesn’t someone say, no, scream, ‘why the fuck are we talking about closing a hospital here when we could keep it open, and a dozen others like it, by keeping what we toss away on foreign aid?’  Would not €100 million be better spent on reducing health service waiting lists than on buying jet fighters for the Ugandan Air Force?  Yes, lying on the table, in all its glory, lies an annualised pot of about €700 million which the pols could redeploy overnight with zero impact on the voting public. Yet it remains sacrosanct.

But help might be coming from an unlikely source: Zimbabwe.  Dambisa Moyo in her Dead Aid: Why Aid is Not Working shows that  systematic aid increases corruption, destroys accountability and inhibits entrepreneurship, fosters laziness in governments and citizens, encourages “reckless consumption” instead of investment in the domestic infrastructure, and foments conflict — even civil wars — because warring factions are intoxicated by the prospect of gaining access to all that free cash. A position Bill Gates described as 'promoting evil' no less. And in fairness Bill is more than familiar with the concept of promoting evil.

So why does the West continue to pour money into international aid? As with most other weighty issues the answer will be found if you 'follow the money'. And in this instance the money keeps a massive aid industry (estimated to employ in the region of 500,000 world-wide with the World Bank octopus-like at its centre) in continuous operation. And here I'm in agreement with the many African nationalists who claim that the aid industry actually doesn't want to cure the economic ills of Africa for the simple reason that were such ills to be miraculously cured they all be out of their comfortable well-paid jobs. In this they're like big pharma which would be out of  business if cures  for  major illnesses were discovered. I experienced this myself directly when heading up the design team for a national telecommunications infrastructure project in Ghana about twenty years ago. Within two weeks it became clear that the project's resources would be plundered by the local bigwigs while designated local staff lacked the necessary skills and experience. I recommended to the WB Project Director that the initiative be abandoned before serious money was flushed down the drain.His reaction was astonishing. He nearly freaked out and came close to admitting that his criterion for success was more about the ability to spend the money rather than achieve the stated objectives.

But that still leaves the question hanging as to why national politicians are so reluctant to tuck into this trough of goodies. After all the numbers directly working in aid industry are comparatively small (although any number is too big) and while the SJWs and their media shills would have a collective fit of the vapours the general voting pubic would be far more grounded. Or based as they say now. 

So..... are there other  forces at work?

Monday, 9 October 2017

The perils of blending

This from Nilus, popular commentator and ace jewdar sleuth in the comment section of the previous post: "Tell me there's not an Irishman that could watch this and not get furious". Well nilus here's one Irishman who got seriously furious, suffused with a cold anger. He was referring to a series of ads running for Tullamore Dew blended Irish whiskey (here and here). No surprise that they're straight out of the Great Book Of Diversity Cliches.

Authoritative-Black-Female walks out on Mewling-White-Beta boyfriend contemptuously dismissing the 'Irish' on her way. This of course is most certainly not racist, just cute. Cut to panel of typical Irish bar-flies, White-guy, Black-guy, Asian-guy to whom Mewling-White-Beta spouts stage Oirish 'poetry' (the Oirish are all poets you know) as he mourns the loss of his magic negress. Then, in a stunning demonstration of their Irishness the mystery meat barflies break into a heartfelt rendition of 'Danny Boy'. See, they're just as Irish as any of us!

Which leads me to my first question. If blacks and Asians (and by inference anybody else roosting here) can be authentically Irish then what does being Irish mean?  Prior to the very recent immivasion the Irish gene pool was made up virtually 100% of Celts, Anglo-Saxons, Vikings and Normans. This blending over a thousand years and more gave us the characteristics that today define Irishness, the memes the company deploys to hype its products while portraying typical Irish barflies as multiracial hybrids. Inconsistency?

Then we come to the central dilemma of diversity: We're bombarded day and night with the manifold (though never explained) benefits and joys of diversity. Yet the race-mixing that they promote with equal enthusiasm will logically lead to the elimination of diversity as we all become coffee-coloured mongrels. Indeed Tullamore Dew lay great emphasis on the subtle blending that's gone into the development of their products. So they'd be the first to admit that should some naughty employee drop a juicy turd into the whiskey vat the blend might suffer somewhat.  Indeed. Point being, blending can make something worse or better whether you're making whiskey or making a nation. As one commentator put it "a successful blend needs to be poured slowly, be well thought out, with ingredients that complement it and improve it, whilst staying true to it's natural character. "

In conclusion I reiterate my cold bitterness towards those who develop and publish the traitorous bilge that these ads represent. 
Frank Galton reveals that the ad campaign was developed by NY agency (((Opperman Weiss))).


Friday, 6 October 2017

Slobodan Milosovic - what we can learn

When writing on the Rohingya (self-induced) crisis a few weeks back I observed that when the USA, all of its Western lapdogs, the UN, NATO, the mainstream media, all the 'independent' think fact when every official source speaks with one voice you can be sure of but one thing: A major mind-fuck is underway. Hark back now to Slobodan Milosovic and the breakup of Yugoslavia, the Bosnian Civil War and its subsequent bastard child in Kosovo.

Milosovic we were told was a war criminal of the worst kind, in fact the greatest mass murderer since WW II, on a par with Hitler, responsible for the massive ethnic cleansing, mass graves and death camps of Bosnia. He was the master-mind directing Bosnian Serb leader Radovan Karadžić whose militias carried out the atrocities on the ground. The whole sorry mess was brought to an end only by the eventual and reluctant involvement of NATO whose relentless bombing campaign forced Serbia and Milsoveic to surrender.

And then justice was served as he was brought to trial in a blaze of publicity at the Hague for his 'war crimes'. His death during the trial was presented by the media and the Western political establishment - but I repeat myself - as justice denied to his countless victims. However the subsequent verdict of the court painted a very different picture. Here's an excerpt of the Tribunal's General Conclusion (full report here)

"With regard to the evidence presented in this case in relation to Slobodan Milošević and his membership in the JCE, the Chamber recalls that he shared and endorsed the political objective of the Accused and the Bosnian Serb leadership to preserve Yugoslavia and to prevent the separation or independence of BiH and co-operated closely with the Accused during this time. The Chamber also recalls that Milošević provided assistance in the form of personnel, provisions, and arms to the Bosnian Serbs during the conflict.

However, based on the evidence before the Chamber regarding the diverging interests that emerged between the Bosnian Serb and Serbian leaderships during the conflict and in particular, Milošević’s repeated criticism and disapproval of the policies and decisions made by the Accused and the Bosnian Serb leadership,the Chamber is not satisfied that there was sufficient evidence presented in this case to find that Slobodan Milošević agreed with the common plan."

Naturally these findings were buried by the whores in the Western media who'd have been forced to admit that the whole pantomime was a ploy by our globalist overlords to achieve multiple goals by using its economic power and NATO's military might to destroy a friend of Russia, an opponent of NATO, a strong nationalist and an Orthodox Christian. They succeeded. And they're still at it in the same region by stoking Albanian resistance in Macedonia just like they did in Kosovo. All in the name of freedom and democracy of course.

The sad part for me personally is that I fell for the whole charade at the time. But I've learned from that mistake. Hopefully we'll all recognise it the next time they try it on.

Monday, 2 October 2017

Every little bit helps!

Stefan Molyneux has built up an enormous Youtube following with a platform  that should on the face of it make him a hero to us on the at-right (I'll use that expression as a catch-all to cover those defending White interests). He exposes the devastating impact of feminism on society, calls out 'liberals' for their hypocrisy and double-standards, traces the spread of the Cultural Marxism infection through our institutions, exposes the insanities of the equalist and globalist agendas, isn't afraid to highlight black criminality and low achievement.

So what's the problem? The problem is that Molyneux, himself being Jewish, fails to identify the central Jewish role in the pathologies he rails against. In fact it'd be fairer to say that he carefully redirects his listeners' attention away from the centrality of the Jewish role. That's bad of course and as a consequence his standing is pretty low on the alt-right. And it is true that a failure to identify the war on Whites for what it is - a Jewish project - means we'll never win it.

But I'd still argue that Molyneux and others like him (e.g. Jordan Peterson) that avoid the JQ provide a valuable service. First by the very fact of identifying and refuting the pathologies that beset us. At a minimum this leads to large numbers of people questioning The Narrative of our globo-homo overlords. The biggest obstacle we face is ignorance and the apathy that follows from it. SM is waking such people up. Crucially, many of the awoken then begin to go further and ask how things have come to this and who is responsible. That's where it gets interesting because, as can be seen from the comments section, many of his fans are putting two and two together and coming up with a total which undoubtedly makes him uncomfortable. Even were the editorial scalpel to be wielded ruthlessly what has been seen cannot be unseen.

And essentially that's my point. Molyneux and others like him are doing the Lord's work even if part of their objective is misdirection. They're waking Whites up and that is the first step and an essential one. So cut him some slack and capitalise on his work by using his comments section. Every little bit helps!

Thursday, 28 September 2017

End world poverty now!

In a recent issue of the Rothschild-owned Economist Professor Bryan Caplan argued that labour is the world’s most valuable commodity and its value depends on location. Apparently if borders were open, a world of free movement would be $78 trillion richer than it is now. Mexican labourers would earn 150% more in the West while an unskilled Nigerian worker in Europe could make 1000 times (sic) as much in Germany as he would back home, adding 100 times more to global GDP than he would by the same work in Nigeria. 

Wouldn't that be wonderful? Well, no, as most readers quickly pointed out, and for a number of reasons. For a start where would we accommodate them, how would we build and staff the thousands of new welfare offices such enrichers would require and treat the explosion of tropical disease accompanying their arrival?

Caplan (changing the 'K' to a 'C' doesn't fool us Prof.) coyly avoids being too specific on such issues, not least because he isn't interested in the goyims' economic welfare. What he wants is to render White nations into atomised and dumbed-down abstractions with no unifying racial, moral, cultural or historical identity. Because in such a miasma an intelligent endogamous tribe will triumph and prosper without fear of exposure. Isn't that right Bryan?

Such a programme is underpinned by the following syllogism:

Free movement of produce = Good (more choice at cheaper prices)

Free movement of produce = free movement of people

Therefore free movement of people = Good

But people and goods are not the same, a fact so self-evident that even an economist or sociology professor could see it. Your Chinese fridge does not yearn for its factory of origin in Shanghai, it works productively from the time it arrives and you won't see it followed into your house by an assortment of cookers and fridges from the same factory. And crucially, you can throw it out when it gives trouble.

Then the most basic question: Why are the Nigerians 1000 times more productive in Germany than they are in Nigeria? Caplan has an answer for that: The infrastructure in White countries. Which in turn makes one ask why our infrastructure is so superior. We know the answer. But we won't hear it from Caplan any more than we did from (((Jared Diamond))) in Guns, Germs and Steel.

To bolster my point I now cite a few recent media reports.

Mother, 27, arrested after charred remains of her daughter found on a barbecue. Neighbours called police in Zemst, Belgium, on Sunday after seeing smoke. She is reported to have told officers 'we had to burn together to get into heaven' . The woman, believed to be of African descent, had reportedly been depressed for some time after going through a divorce.

Witch doctors are sacrificing children in drought-stricken Uganda. Jackline Mukisa sobbed as she described how her 8-year-old son was found in a nearby swamp in February without teeth, lips, ears and genitals. His remains suggest he was slowly killed as part of a human sacrifice ritual performed by witch doctors, apparently to appease the spirits.

A Bronx student stabbed a classmate to death with a switchblade and seriously injured another in front of more than a dozen classmates inside their high school Wednesday morning after being accidentally hit by a flying pencil. 

And this bastion of learning's name? The Urban Assembly School for Wildlife Conservation.

Truly fact is stranger than fiction!

Sunday, 24 September 2017

What would you do?

Douglas Murray is coming under increasing odium in WN circles for his repeated failure to finger the Jewish role in Europe's ongoing destruction.  In this interview he actually deemed anti-Semites (i.e. those who refuse to buy into The Narrative) as mentally ill.

Having studied the destruction of Europe, the strange death of Europe in fact, he knows the deal. He understand the Jewish role as well as anyone does. Yet he resolutely refuses to identify it. What does that make him? Well before we become too judgemental put yourself in his position for a moment. At present he enjoys fame and fortune and the future is roses all the way. But should he do a David Irving or an Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn that would change. Change utterly and immediately. 

Irving and Solzhenitsyn went from being celebrated wealthy writers to oblivion almost overnight. Now ask yourself honestly what you'd do in his position. Especially if, unlike him, you had a family to provide for. I'll disappoint you by admitting I'd be unlikely to bite the bullet. Not sure that I'd consign myself and my family to the impoverishment and persecution that would inevitably follow.

However biting your tongue or a little bit of dissimulation is one thing, actively obscuring the source of the problem is something else entirely. And that's what Douglas Murray's been doing. So he's a fair-weather friend at best.

The key issue is not his personal bravely or integrity, it's how we Whites can regain control of our own destiny from the hostile minority which has seized it.